Recent Posts
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Thankful
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
The Power of Two
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Visualizing Inclusion at KIT's National Conference
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
A Daily Reminder from a Blow Dryer
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Making Space
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Find Inspiration, Reflect Deeply
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
The Journey
Big news! We have a new CEO at KIT. You may have seen the announcements that our beloved Jan Giacinti retired as of June 30. We were excited to welcome a new CEO to the KIT team (and a man, at that!). It has already been so fun to have an outside perspective on our work, with new questions and a fresh set of eyes on how we do business. At our recent staff meeting Jeff brought up the subject of quality, and how it’s not a destination we arrive at but more of an on-going practice. Yes!
What this brought up for me is related to how we teach organizations about inclusion. We are fond of saying that inclusion is a process and not a product and that the journey to inclusion really is the destination. There is no point when an organization crosses a finish line and can throw their arms up in the air and say “We did it! We are now officially inclusive!” It’s something you are constantly striving for, always refining and forever enhancing. Just when you think you’ve mastered it there will be a new challenge or you will find a new, better way of ensuring that your services can be accessed by everyone. And there is so much value in the journey. The exploration of an organization’s values, and the concept of working through the process of ensuring access is what actually leads to the organizational transformation.
When we deliver our services we are committed to what we call a “parallel process.” We want to model the behaviors that we hope our learners will adopt. We do this in our training modules by teaching the way we hope participants will teach others. We also strive to conduct our organizational business in this manner as well. This is why I saw the connection to quality so strongly. Achieving quality is also a journey, and going on the journey is what leads to better quality. There are some benchmarks along the way, but the finish line is ever changing. I know that at KIT we are so mission-focused that we keep moving the finish line farther and farther away from where we are now. It’s something I have always loved about being a part of KIT. The constant examination of what it means to have high quality (or be inclusive) is what makes it happen.
To all of you, my incredible KIT colleagues and those who engage with KIT at any level, I say let’s enjoy the journey!
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Our Future is in Good Hands!
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
“Honey, you have to see the interview on Colbert from last night. The CEO of Special Olympics was on talking about person-first language!” my husband excitedly said to me one morning last week. I had fallen asleep while we were watching it together the night before. And, no, I didn’t fall asleep during it’s 11:30pm timeslot. I am (just a little) embarrassed to admit that we were watching our DVR’d version at about 8pm!
| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| Tim Shriver | ||||
| www.colbertnation.com | ||||
| ||||
OK. Pretty good, right? By “pretty” I mean, I love to see this kind of advocacy taking place on a show with such wide influence. Also, I do love the R-word campaign. But, by “pretty,” I also mean that I do have some criticisms. With no disrespect meant to Tim Shriver, President and CEO of Special Olympics, I think he got a little lost in his message. Here is what I mean:
The clip is about the “R-word” campaign. However, Mr. Shriver talks about person-first language and the importance of putting the person before the disability. In my opinion, that doesn’t have much to do with the R-word campaign, which is focused on stopping people from using the word “retard” as a slang insult. The campaign is beautiful and effective in its simplicity. Instead, Mr. Shriver talked about how mental retardation was a term that was used in the past and that now the term is intellectual disabilities. Which is true, but not really related to the R-word campaign. Which brings me to my next point…
· Mr. Shriver said that, although he knew that others didn’t like it, he likes the term “intellectual diffabilities” (a mash-up of the word “difference” and the word “disability”). I, personally, have a strong negative reaction to that term. It is one of those cringe-inducing, overly euphemistic terms like handicapable or differently-abled.
· I also didn’t love how he explained person-first language. I sat there thinking that I could do a much better job. Of course, being interviewed by Stephen Colbert may be one of the hardest things to do on television, so I shouldn’t be so judgmental. And I am really not trying to be judgey. I know Mr. Shriver was trying to poke fun at Colbert when he called him a “person with goop in his hair,” but I don’t know if it really helped viewers develop any new understanding of people with disabilities.
Again, no disrespect intended to Mr. Shriver and the incredible work he and his family have done for people with disabilities.
What are your thoughts?
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
We have an app! How cool are we?

